Rj. Loch et Jl. Foley, MEASUREMENT OF AGGREGATE BREAKDOWN UNDER RAIN - COMPARISON WITH TESTSOF WATER STABILITY AND RELATIONSHIPS WITH FIELD-MEASUREMENTS OF INFILTRATION, Australian Journal of Soil Research, 32(4), 1994, pp. 701-720
This paper reports comparisons between aggregate breakdown on wetting
by rainfall with breakdown measured by a range of alternative methods.
It also reports correlations between measured breakdown and steady in
filtration rates of simulated rain of high and low energy, and hydraul
ic conductivities of surface seal layers formed under high energy rain
. A wide range of soils in eastern Australia were studied. Highly sign
ificant correlations were found between measurements of aggregate brea
kdown to < 125 mu m caused by rainfall wetting and both steady infiltr
ation rates and hydraulic conductivities. Significant, but poorer corr
elations were found between steady infiltration rates and breakdown re
sulting from immersion wetting. Deletion of swelling soils from the da
ta set greatly improved correlations between steady infiltration rates
of high energy rain and breakdown measured by both immersion and tens
ion wetting, showing that these methods of wetting ace particularly in
appropriate for swelling soils. No correlation was found between infil
tration rates and measured clay dispersion. Different relationships be
tween the proportion of particles (%) < 125 mu m at the soil surface (
P-125) and steady infiltration rates of low and high energy rain indic
ated that compaction of the soil surface layer, rather than increased
aggregate breakdown, is a major cause of surface sealing by raindrop i
mpacts. Measurements of fall cone penetration confirmed that drop impa
cts had compacted the surface layer. Suctions across the surface seal
were related to P-125 in that layer, and the relationship obtained was
used in calculating hydraulic conductivities. The results confirm tha
t measurement of aggregate breakdown under rainfall wetting produces r
esults of much greater relevance to soil behaviour under field conditi
ons than do tests based on immersion and tension wetting.