Rh. Gottlieb et al., RENAL SONOGRAPHY - CAN IT BE USED MORE SELECTIVELY IN THE SETTING OF AN ELEVATED SERUM CREATININE LEVEL, American journal of kidney diseases, 29(3), 1997, pp. 362-367
The objectives of our study were to (1) assess the outcomes resulting
from the use of sonography in patients referred to our institution's u
ltrasound laboratory for an elevated serum creatinine level and (2) de
termine relevant clinical parameters in these patients to better triag
e them for sonography. We retrospectively identified and determined ou
tcomes of 60 patients (20 women, 40 men; mean age, 61 years; range, 33
to 100 years) referred for sonographic evaluation because of an incre
ased serum creatinine level (greater than or equal to 1.3 mg/dL). Ultr
asound findings (hydronephrosis, renal size, and echogenicity) were co
rrelated with clinical outcomes. Twenty-one patients (35%) had hydrone
phrosis, with 14 of these patients confirmed to be obstructed and five
not obstructed, Two were indeterminate for obstruction, Eight of 14 o
bstructed patients were successfully treated, All obstructed patients
had a suggestive history for obstruction with at least one of the foll
owing: pelvic mass (n = 9), stone disease (n = 4), or flank pain (n =
1). Only 2 of 44 patients, who were not obstructed, had any of these p
arameters (statistically significant difference, P < 0.0001), Thirty o
f the patients, who were not obstructed, had more likely alternative c
auses for renal failure, with sonography having no effect on patient m
anagement. Renal size and echogenicity had little effect on patient ma
nagement, Sonography was efficacious in guiding management in patients
with a suggestive history for obstruction (eg, pelvic mass, stone dis
ease, or flank pain) but not in most patients who had no suggestive hi
story and other more likely causes for renal failure. (C) 1997 by the
National Kidney Foundation, Inc.