Nl. Gilinsky et Jb. Bennington, ESTIMATING NUMBERS OF WHOLE INDIVIDUALS FROM COLLECTIONS OF BODY PARTS - A TAPHONOMIC LIMITATION OF THE PALEONTOLOGICAL RECORD, Paleobiology, 20(2), 1994, pp. 245-258
Paleoecologists have long sought to obtain estimates of the sizes of e
xtinct populations. However, even in ideal cases, accurate counts of i
ndividuals have been hampered by the fact that many organisms disartic
ulate after death and leave their remains in the form of multiple, sep
arated parts. We here analyze the problem of estimating numbers of ind
ividuals from collections of parts by developing a general counting th
eory that elucidates the major contributing variables. We discover tha
t the number of unique individuals of a particular species that are re
presented in a fossil. collection can be described by an intricate set
of relationships among (1) the number of body parts that were recover
ed, (2) the number of body parts that were possessed by organisms belo
nging to that species, and (3) the number of individuals of that speci
es that served as the source of the parts from which the paleontologic
al sample was obtained (the size of the ''sampling domain''). The ''mi
nimum number of individuals'' and ''maximum number of individuals'' me
thods currently used by paleontologists to count individuals emerge as
end members in our more general, counting theory. The theory shows th
at the numbers of individuals of a species that are represented in a s
ample of body parts is fully tractable, at least in a theoretical sens
e, in terms of the variables just mentioned. The bad news is that the
size of the ''sampling domain'' for a species can never be known exact
ly, thus placing a very real limit on our ability to count individuals
rigorously. The good news is that one can often make a reasonable gue
ss regarding the size of the sampling domain, and can therefore make a
more thoroughly informed choice regarding how to estimate numbers of
individuals. By isolating the variables involved in determining the nu
mbers of individuals in paleontological samples, we are led to a bette
r appreciation of the limits, and the possibilities, that are inherent
in the fossil record.