Whereas the macroeconomic relationship between technology choice and i
ncome distribution has so far been studied in the agricultural context
, this paper studies the issue from the standpoint of manufacturing in
dustry. We suggest that there are historical reasons why labor-intensi
ve techniques tend to be more egalitarian in their impact than capital
-intensive techniques. These hypotheses are tested by means of a disag
gregated SAM for Indonesia and with the assistance of structural path
analysis. In general the empirical analysis confirms our theoretical e
xpectations. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd.