SUPPLEMENTAL BORON, BELL RETENTION PERCENTAGE, OVARY CARBOHYDRATES, AND LINT YIELD IN MODERN COTTON GENOTYPES

Authors
Citation
Jj. Heitholt, SUPPLEMENTAL BORON, BELL RETENTION PERCENTAGE, OVARY CARBOHYDRATES, AND LINT YIELD IN MODERN COTTON GENOTYPES, Agronomy journal, 86(3), 1994, pp. 492-497
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture
Journal title
ISSN journal
00021962
Volume
86
Issue
3
Year of publication
1994
Pages
492 - 497
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-1962(1994)86:3<492:SBBRPO>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is sometimes grown on soils with low B concentration. However, most of the literature regarding the effects o f supplemental B on cotton was obtained from obsolete, low-yielding ge notypes rather than modern, high-yielding genotypes. Therefore, the ob jective of this study was to determine the effects of soil- and foliar -applied B on leaf blade B concentration, bell retention, and lint yie ld of modern cotton genotypes. In 1991, three genotypes (DES 119, DES 24-8 ne normal leaf, and DES 24-8 ne okra leaf) and in 1992, two genot ypes (Deltapine 20 and Deltapine 5415) of cotton were grown in the fie ld on a Beulah fine sandy loam (coarse-loamy, mixed, thermic Typic Dys trochrepts) having 0.11 mg kg(-1) hot water extractable B concentratio n. Treatments included preplant soil and foliar (first flower to end o f bloom) B (78% Na2B8O13.4H(2)O, 20% Na2B4O7.5H(2)O) applications for seasonal totals of 0, 0.89, or 1.78 (1992 only) kg B ha(-1). The lowes t rate of foliar-applied B increased leaf blade B concentration from 2 5 to 70 mg kg(-1) in 1991 and from 54 to 108 mg kg(-1) in 1992. In 199 2, the highest rate of foliar B applications resulted in a leaf blade concentration of 154 mg B kg(-1). Soil-applied B did not alter leaf bl ade B concentration in 1991, but slightly increased leaf blade B conce ntration in 1992 from 54 to 71 mg kg(-1). Soil B concentrations were h igher during the midseason than the preplant period, suggesting that p replant soil B analysis may not accurately foreshadow soil B supply du ring the season. Soil B or foliar B applications did not affect bell r etention percentage, flower number, or lint yield in either year. Supp lemental B did not affect bell distribution in 1991, but in 1992, foli ar B applications increased the percentage of fruit on monopodial bran ches. In both years, supplemental B did not greatly affect fiber prope rties with the exception that supplemental B increased fiber micronair e reading of Deltapine 20 in 1992. The results suggest that modern cul tivars may not always need supplemental B when soil B concentration is moderately low.