Although it is evident that disciplines have their distinctive cultura
l characteristics, this consideration tends to be largely overlooked i
n research into, as well as policy-making within, higher education. Th
e paper aims to draw attention to some of the resulting inadequacies i
n analysis and to explore their consequences. After offering an overvi
ew of the various disciplinary cultures, it examines different facets
of academic activity at the macro, meso and micro levels and suggests
that in each case the differences between disciplines are important en
ough to merit general recognition. The author concludes with a brief s
peculation on why the issue is so widely neglected.