Vs. Swaroop et al., COMPARATIVE ENDOSCOPIC STUDY OF PRIMARY GASTRIC LYMPHOMA VS GASTRIC-CARCINOMA, Journal of surgical oncology, 56(2), 1994, pp. 94-97
The endoscopic records of 56 patients with primary gastric lymphoma an
d 120 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (matched for age and sex) w
ere compared with respect to site, extent, and type of tumor by endosc
opy and biopsy results. Diagnosis of lymphoma was suspected on the bas
is of gross endoscopic appearance in 30 patients with 96% sensitivity.
The endoscopic findings that achieved statistical significance in fav
or of lymphoma were extensive disease involving whole stomach, proxima
l stomach involvement, extension of tumor into duodenum, and the prese
nce of volcano crater-like ulcers on polypoid lesions. Endoscopic biop
sies were positive for lymphoma in 92% patients. Immunoperoxidase stai
ning for leucocyte common antigen was positive in all the 24 patients
with lymphoma where it was performed. We conclude that lymphoid origin
of the stomach tumor may be suspected in one-half of the cases of pri
mary gastric lymphoma by gross endoscopic findings. Multiple endoscopi
c biopsies are safe and highly sensitive and specific in the diagnosis
of primary gastric lymphoma. (C) 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.