During the past few years there has been a resurgence of interest in k
inetic aspects of analytical chemistry and in kinetic methods of analy
sis. The increased activity is a result of advances that have been mad
e in instrumentation and in data processing techniques. Still, the kin
etic approach is not widely applied by practicing analytical chemists.
Why is this true? Why are kinetic methods not among the most common m
ethods in use by analytical chemistry? This paper discusses the advant
ages and limitations of kinetic methods and addresses the probable rea
sons that they are not widely used. Several new principles have emerge
d that are guiding the development of new kinetic-based determinations
. These developments have made it possible to compensate for errors th
at result from changes in reaction conditions and to determine accurat
ely multiple components in mixtures. With these advances kinetic metho
ds are approaching the reliability of traditional equilibrium-based de
terminations and should be re-evaluated by analytical chemists.