HOW CONSUMERS MAY JUSTIFY INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR IN MARKET SETTINGS -AN APPLICATION ON THE TECHNIQUES OF NEUTRALIZATION

Citation
D. Strutton et al., HOW CONSUMERS MAY JUSTIFY INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR IN MARKET SETTINGS -AN APPLICATION ON THE TECHNIQUES OF NEUTRALIZATION, Journal of business research, 30(3), 1994, pp. 253-260
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
Business
ISSN journal
01482963
Volume
30
Issue
3
Year of publication
1994
Pages
253 - 260
Database
ISI
SICI code
0148-2963(1994)30:3<253:HCMJIB>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
Consumer-initiated fraud is an ongoing problem for marketers, The abil ity of marketers to combat the problem is undermined by the fact that otherwise principled individuals often selectively engage in consumer fraud. The techniques of neutralization (Sykes and Matza, 1957) are in vestigated as a possible explanation for how consumers may diminish th eir perceived guilt for their inappropriate behaviors in retail settin gs. The techniques of neutralization appear more appropriate as an exp lanatory framework in situations that involve the unethical dispositio n, as opposed to the acquisition, of retailing goods. Approaches by wh ich retailers might be able to reduce unethical disposition behavior a re discussed.