Telemarketing has mushroomed in the last several years. This increased
telephone activity by commercial sellers has raised questions about t
he competing rights of the caller and the called party. Federal and st
ate laws have been enacted to protect consumers' in-home privacy right
s and to eliminate improper and sometimes dangerous uses of automated
call delivery systems. However, telemarketers enjoy free speech rights
under the commercial speech doctrine - a doctrine that the Supreme Co
urt recently revitalized in Cincinnati v. Discovery Network. Neverthel
ess, traditional commercial speech and privacy analyses ignore some of
the unique concerns of telephone subscribers, who pay for the telepho
ne line into the home which becomes the telemarketers' advertising out
let.