COMPARISON OF A LONG-ACTING LHRH AGONIST AND POLYESTRADIOL PHOSPHATE IN THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED PROSTATIC-CARCINOMA - AN OPEN PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED MULTICENTER STUDY
O. Lukkarinen et M. Kontturi, COMPARISON OF A LONG-ACTING LHRH AGONIST AND POLYESTRADIOL PHOSPHATE IN THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED PROSTATIC-CARCINOMA - AN OPEN PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED MULTICENTER STUDY, Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology, 28(2), 1994, pp. 171-178
In a prospective, randomized open study, a long-acting LHRH agonist (Z
oladex((R))) was compared with polyoestradiol phosphate (Estradurin((R
))), both widely used in Finland for palliative treatment of prostatic
carcinoma, as regards efficacy and side effects. Of the 236 enrolled
patients, 129 were randomized to receive LHRH agonist and 107 to oestr
ogen treatment. The median follow-up was 25 months. Reduction of prost
atic volume was quicker and more effective in the LHRH than in the oes
trogen group, and serum testosterone concentrations fell to castration
level after 1 month and 1 year, respectively. In locally advanced (MO
) and histologically well or moderately differentiated tumours, LHRH a
gonist therapy was considerably more effective than oestrogen as regar
ds time to progression of the carcinoma, but in metastatic (M1) and hi
stologically poorly differentiated tumours both methods gave similar r
esults. Cardiovascular complications showed equal incidence in both gr
oups. LHRH agonist therapy thus seemed to be more effective than polyo
estradiol phosphate against locally advanced prostatic cancer in the d
oses used.