A PREVALENCE STUDY OF KNOWN DIABETES-MELLITUS IN TUSCANY ASSESSED FROM PHARMACEUTICAL PRESCRIPTIONS AND OTHER INDEPENDENT SOURCES

Citation
G. Dicianni et al., A PREVALENCE STUDY OF KNOWN DIABETES-MELLITUS IN TUSCANY ASSESSED FROM PHARMACEUTICAL PRESCRIPTIONS AND OTHER INDEPENDENT SOURCES, Acta diabetologica, 31(2), 1994, pp. 87-90
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology & Metabolism
Journal title
ISSN journal
09405429
Volume
31
Issue
2
Year of publication
1994
Pages
87 - 90
Database
ISI
SICI code
0940-5429(1994)31:2<87:APSOKD>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
This study evaluates the prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) in Pisa (Tuscany, Italy) using four independent data sources. The main source, represented by computerized prescriptions for anti-diabetic agents co llected over a 4-month period, was validated using three secondary sou rces: (a) the list of diabetic patients who receive material of self-c are from the National Health Service; (b) the clinical records of diab etic patients obtained from a random sample of family doctors; (c) the clinical records of diabetic patients attending our outpatient clinic . The main source provided 3806 patients, and 697 patients were added from the secondary sources, thus identifying a total number of 4503. T he prevalence of known DM in the ''Pisa area'' exclusively reckoned by the main source, was 2.01%, and the prevalence corrected by the addit ion of the various sources resulted in 2.4%. The capture-recapture met hod showed a completeness of ascertainment of the survey of 90.1%, and thus an estimated prevalence of known diabetes Of 2.64%. Of these, 14 1 patients had insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) correspondin g to 3.2% of identified diabetic subjects (prevalence 0.07% inhabitant s); 4362 patients had non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), 96.8% of identified diabetic subjects (prevalence 2.36%). Of patients with NIDDM 10.5% was treated by diet, 65% with oral hypoglycaemic age nts (OHA), 23% with insulin and 1.5% with insulin plus OHA. This study shows that the method used in this survey is suitable for epidemiolog ical studies because it does not demand the cooperation of the diabeti c patients, is addressed to the entire diabetic population without age discrimination and singles out the diabetic population in a very reli able way.