G. Nigenda et A. Solorzano, DOCTORS AND CORPORATIST POLITICS - THE CASE OF THE MEXICAN MEDICAL-PROFESSION, Journal of health politics, policy and law, 22(1), 1997, pp. 73-99
This study advances our understanding of the relationship between the
state and the medical profession in countries where health care servic
es are used as instruments of economic and political control. As a gen
eral argument, we maintain that the corporatist nature of the Mexican
state impedes the medical profession from achieving autonomy and contr
ol over its professional activities. In contraposition to medical prof
essions in developed societies, the nature of the Mexican profession i
s shaped by state policies and by its reiterated efforts to act indepe
ndently of the state's tutelage. We analyze this dynamic interaction t
hrough three different historical epochs that reflect the complexity a
nd uniqueness of the Mexican medical profession. Whatever attempts the
profession has made to control the medical curriculum, the licensing
process, the market, or the specific laws that affect its own field, t
he Mexican state has responded with measures that systematically divid
e and antagonize the different factions of medical associations. The r
esult is a highly fragmented and disenfranchised medical profession wi
th dissimilar political, professional, personal, and academic aims. In
the final analysis, the interests of the corporatist Mexican state pr
evail over the interests of other groups, including doctors. The evisc
eration of the medical corps by the Mexican state results in a profess
ion with low salaries, higher rates of unemployment, atomization in te
rms of political representation, and heavily co-opted medical organiza
tions that seem to neglect the overwhelming health care needs of the M
exican people.