INCIDENCE OF LATE-DIAGNOSED HIP-DYSPLASIA AFTER DIFFERENT SCREENING METHODS IN NEWBORNS

Citation
A. Tegnander et al., INCIDENCE OF LATE-DIAGNOSED HIP-DYSPLASIA AFTER DIFFERENT SCREENING METHODS IN NEWBORNS, Journal of pediatric orthopedics. Part B, 3(1), 1994, pp. 86-88
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Orthopedics,Pediatrics
ISSN journal
1060152X
Volume
3
Issue
1
Year of publication
1994
Pages
86 - 88
Database
ISI
SICI code
1060-152X(1994)3:1<86:IOLHAD>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
We compared the effectiveness of different approaches to hip screening in newborns. Three groups were studied: children born in our hospital from 1980 through 1985 who were clinically examined by pediatricians (group A), children born in 1986 and 1987 who were examined by ultraso und (US) in addition to clinical examination (group B), and children b orn in three district hospitals where neonatal clinical screening had not been performed by pediatricians (group C). There were significant differences between the three groups in the incidence of late-diagnose d hip dysplasia (HD): 2.6 in 1,000, 0.7 in 1,000, and 5.3 in 1,000, re spectively. We conclude that US screening of hips in newborns was more effective than clinical screening alone and that clinical screening b y pediatricians was superior to screening by doctors with less experie nce in examining children. US appears to have the potential to eradica te late-diagnosed dislocations, but milder degrees of HD still occur. With regard to the US method, measurement of femoral head coverage app ears to be more adequate than subjective evaluation only.