Prognostic factors and treatment results were analysed in 28 consecuti
ve patients with primary gastric lymphoma (PGL) diagnosed and treated,
all by surgery and in many cases with additional chemotherapy (CT) an
d/or radiotherapy (RT), between 1977 and 1988. There were 13 patients
in stage I(E), 5 in II(E), and 10 in stage IV. The resection rate was
96.4% (27/28). Sixteen patients underwent an extended total and 11 a s
ubtotal gastrectomy. Seventeen out of 25 cases (68%) were diagnosed by
endoscopic biopsies. In 10 endoscopically diagnosed PGL cases the cli
nical staging and separation between stages I(E) and II(E) from stage
IV, due to ultrasonographic scan, computed tomography and bone marrow
biopsy, was correct and the same with the surgical-pathological stagin
g information. According to the Kiel-classification 18 patients had a
low-grade and 9 patients a high-grade lymphoma. One patient could not
be classified. All patients were completely followed-up, in an average
time of 52 months. The probability of overall 5-year survival was 92%
in stage I(E), 75% in stage II(E), 88% in stages I(E)+II(E) together,
and 35% in stage IV. Extent of surgery (total vs. subtotal gastrectom
y), Kiel-classification (low-grade vs. high-grade malignant histologic
subtypes) and adjuvant CT in patients with stage I(E) (all 11 patient
s without CT remain in complete remission after an average of 45 month
s) did not significantly influence survival. The sole prognostic facto
r with proven impact on survival was the stage of disease (I(E)+II(E)
vs. IV: P=0.0001). For the Kiel-classification in particular there was
no significant difference between low-grade and high-grade lymphomas
with regard to the sex, symptomatic, extent of surgery, and stage at o
peration. These findings, together with data from the literature, sugg
est that gastric resection seems to be the optimal primary treatment i
n clinically assessed stages I(E) or II(E). In patients with stage I(E
) disease, surgical resection can result in a cure, with no need for f
urther therapy. The CT and/or RT can be effective in unresected and ev
en bulky cases. Because of the difference in primary treatment, a preo
perative clinical staging and separation between early stages from sta
ge IV is always indicated.