Kb. Hallett et F. Garciagodoy, MICROLEAKAGE OF RESIN MODIFIED GLASS-IONOMER CEMENT RESTORATIONS - ANIN-VITRO STUDY, Dental materials, 9(5-6), 1993, pp. 306-311
Microleakage of two resin-modified glass ionomer cement (GIC) restorat
ive materials was compared with that of two conventional GIC restorati
ve materials. Forty-five noncarious extracted human molars were prepar
ed with standardized Class V cavity outlines on the buccal and lingual
surfaces. The occlusal margin was in enamel and the gingival margin w
as in dentin/cementum. All were restored according to the manufacturer
s' instructions. After thermocycling, 30 teeth were placed in 2% basic
fuchsin dye for 24 h, sectioned and viewed with a stereomicroscope to
assess microleakage. The other 15 teeth were sectioned, replicated an
d prepared for marginal gap evaluation using a SEM. Differences in mic
roleakage scores between materials were compared using Kruskal-Wallis
and Mann-Whitney U tests. One resin-modified GIC restorative material
showed significantly less microleakage against enamel and dentin/cemen
tum compared to the conventional GIC restorative (p<0.01). Marginal ga
p formation for both resin-modified GIC restorations was limited to th
e axial wall of the restorations.