MAMMOGRAPHY SCREENING - ONE VERSUS 2 VIEWS AND INDEPENDENT DOUBLE READING

Authors
Citation
E. Thurfjell, MAMMOGRAPHY SCREENING - ONE VERSUS 2 VIEWS AND INDEPENDENT DOUBLE READING, Acta radiologica, 35(4), 1994, pp. 345-350
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Journal title
ISSN journal
02841851
Volume
35
Issue
4
Year of publication
1994
Pages
345 - 350
Database
ISI
SICI code
0284-1851(1994)35:4<345:MS-OV2>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Five experienced screeners independently and blindly reviewed mammogra ms from the first screening round of 46 healthy women, and of 74 women who had histologically proven breast cancers in the first screening r ound or later. The films were reviewed first as one-view screening and later as two-view screening. Fifty-one breast cancers were detected b y at least one of the screeners on either one-view or two-view screeni ng. The mean increase in sensitivity by using two views, instead of on e, was 2%. The median of the proportional increase in detected cancers as the result of independent double reading was 14.5% with one-view s creening and 12% with two-view screening. Two screeners using one-view screening detected about 10% more cancers than one screener using two -view screening.