BEHIND THE MARKET STAGE WHERE REAL SOCIETIES EXIST .1. THE ROLE OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE ORDER INSTITUTIONS

Authors
Citation
Jp. Platteau, BEHIND THE MARKET STAGE WHERE REAL SOCIETIES EXIST .1. THE ROLE OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE ORDER INSTITUTIONS, Journal of development studies, 30(3), 1994, pp. 533-577
Citations number
124
Categorie Soggetti
Planning & Development
ISSN journal
00220388
Volume
30
Issue
3
Year of publication
1994
Pages
533 - 577
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-0388(1994)30:3<533:BTMSWR>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
This two-part article is an attempt to clarify the social conditions u pon which the viability and efficiency of the market system rest. It s trives to show that the 'embeddedness' thesis, that is, an explanation based upon the existence of long-run personalties involving the use o f reputation mechanisms among transactors, cannot fully elucidate the question as to how the problem of trust is solved in market societies. As explained in Part 1, there are difficulties of both theoretical an d empirical/historical kinds and these explain why the 'market order' needs to be sustained by private and public order institutions. In Par t II, the role of generalised morality in backing or supplementing suc h institutions is discussed in the light of game theory, and particula r emphasis is put on the ability of moral norms to sustain honest beha viour by generating the right kind of preferences and establishing tru st. The vexed problem of the dynamics of norm emergence and erosion is then addressed with a view to showing that norms of generalised moral ity - perhaps contrary to moral norms in small groups - cannot be easi ly created by fiat nor be expected to evolve spontaneously when they a re needed to make economic exchanges viable. Ultimately, the cultural endowment of a society plays a determining role in shaping its specifi c growth trajectory, and history therefore matters. Finally, to illust rate the theoretical discourse, reference is made to present-day Third World countries. It is argued that economic norms of limited-group mo rality prevail and do not readily give way to generalised morality.