L. Kanerva et al., OCCUPATIONAL ALLERGIC CONTACT-DERMATITIS CAUSED BY MERCURY AND BENZOYL PEROXIDE, EJD. European journal of dermatology, 4(5), 1994, pp. 359-361
Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from metallic mercury has sel
dom been reported. Here we present two cases of occupational contact d
ermatitis from mercury. The first patient was Ct chemistry student who
during her practical laboratory work course sed to mercury acetate. S
he was also exposed to metallic mercury which was the final product of
the chemical reaction. Within about three weeks of exposure she devel
oped a vesicular hand dermatitis. Patching testing revealed allergy to
both metallic mercury and mercury salts. The second patient was a den
tist with occupational mercury allergy from amalgam which had develope
d from handling uncured amalgam without protective gloves. The patient
had positive patch test reactions to metallic mercury (0.25%-1% in pe
trolatum), but not to 0.5-10% amalgam in petrolatum. It has recently b
een suggested that 5-10% powder in petrolatum should be used for diagn
ostic patch testing of metallic mercury allergy. Our case indicates th
at self-made amalgam powder in petrolatum may have a low bioavailabili
ty and may not be reliable for patch testing. The dentist also had an
allergic patch test reaction caused by benzoyl peroxide, probably from
work with dental resins.