Hd. Langtry et A. Markham, LISINOPRIL - A REVIEW OF ITS PHARMACOLOGY AND CLINICAL EFFICACY IN ELDERLY PATIENTS, Drugs & aging, 10(2), 1997, pp. 131-166
Lisinopril, the lysine analogue of enalaprilat, is a long-acting angio
tensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor which is administered once da
ily by mouth. The efficacy of lisinopril in reducing blood pressure is
well established in younger populations, and many trials now show it
to be effective in lowering blood pressure in early patients with hype
rtension. In comparative and non-comparative clinical trials, 68.2 to
89.1% of elderly patients responded (diastolic pressure less than or e
qual to 90mm Hg) to greater than or equal to 8 weeks' lisinopril treat
ment. Age-related differences in antihypertensive efficacy do not appe
ar to be clinically significant, and dosages effective in elderly pati
ents tend to range from 2.5 to 40 mg/day. Dosages usually need to be l
ower in patients with significant renal impairment. In congestive hear
t failure, lisinopril 2.5 to 20 mg/day increases exercise duration, im
proves left ventricular ejection fraction and has no significant effec
t on ventricular ectopic beats. It is similar in efficacy to enalapril
and digoxin and similar or superior to captopril on most end-points.
Data from the GISSI-3 post-myocardial infarction trial show that lisin
opril reduced mortality and left ventricular dysfunction when given fo
r 42 days starting within 24 hours of the onset of infarction symptoms
. Results at 6 weeks and 6 months were similar in elderly and younger
patients. Elderly patients, however, among other subgroups, exhibited
a strong reduction in risk of low ejection fraction after treatment (-
25.5%). Economic studies suggest that lisinopril is cost saving compar
ed with other ACE inhibitors in some markets. When given according to
the GISSI-3 protocol, lisinopril appears to be one of the less experie
nce of the successful ACE inhibitor regimens for acute myocardial infa
rction. In other trials, patients with diabetic nephropathy and hypert
ension improved or did not deteriorate during lisinopril treatment. Bl
ood pressure was controlled and reductions or trends towards reduction
s in albuminuria were observed. These reductions were similar to those
in diltiazem, nifedipine and verapamil recipients, and greater than t
hose in patients receiving atenolol. Lisinopril appears to reduce mort
ality in diabetic patients after myocardial infarction and may also im
prove neuropathy associated with diabetes. Lisinopril is well tolerate
d and the profile of adverse events seen is typical of ACE inhibitors
as a class. There is a tendency for more elderly than younger patients
to discontinue treatment, but this trend is not clearly related to th
e incidence of adverse events in these age groups. Drug interactions o
ccur with few other agents and are usually clinically significant only
between lisinopril and either diuretics or lithium. Lisinopril is, th
us, an effective treatment for elderly patients with hypertension, con
gestive heart failure and acute myocardial infarction and has shown pr
omising benefits in patients with diabetic nephropathy.