Lr. Whalen et al., SENSORY NERVE-CONDUCTION VELOCITY OF THE CAUDAL CUTANEOUS SURAL AND MEDIAL CUTANEOUS ANTEBRACHIAL NERVES OF ADULT HORSES, American journal of veterinary research, 55(7), 1994, pp. 892-897
Maximal conduction velocities of compound action potentials evoked by
stimuli of 2 times threshold in the caudal cutaneous sural (CCSN) and
medial cutaneous antebrachial (MCAN) nerves were determined by averagi
ng potentials evoked and recorded through percutaneous needle electrod
es. Mean maximal conduction velocities of compound action potentials w
ere: CCSN = 61.3 +/- 2.0 meters/second (m/s) and MCAN = 56.4 +/- 2.8 m
/s. To confirm accuracy of our percutaneous recordings, compound actio
n potentials were recorded through bipolar chlorided silver electrodes
from the exposed surfaces of fascicles of the CCSN and the MCAN. The
maximal conduction velocities of these potentials were in agreement wi
th the conduction velocities of compound action potentials that were e
voked and recorded through percutaneous needle electrodes. The specifi
city of stimulating and recording sites was verified by recording befo
re and after section of the nerves. Stimuli from 3 to 5 times threshol
d evoked a second, longer latency, compound action potential that cons
isted of a variable number of components in the CCSN and MCAN. The con
figurations and conduction velocities of the shorter latency potential
s were the same as those of the single compound action potentials evok
ed by stimuli of 2 times threshold. Mean conduction velocities of the
longer latency potentials were: CCSN = 24.4 +/- 2.6 m/s and MCAN = 24.
5 +/- 2.2 m/s. Needle electrode and direct stimulation of either the C
CSN or the MCAN at 3 to 5 times threshold failed to evoke contractions
of limb muscles. Therefore, action potentials that contributed to the
evoked compound potentials recorded in these horses arose, most likel
y, from afferent nerve fibers.