Five pigeons served as subjects in an experiment that examined the eff
ects of variable as opposed to fixed delays on preference in a self-co
ntrol paradigm (choice between larger, more delayed and smaller, less
delayed reinforcers). Nonindependent concurrent variable-interval sche
dules were used to measure choice. When delays to the larger, more del
ayed reinforcers were variable as opposed to fixed, the subjects showe
d an increased preference for that alternative (the self-control alter
native). A series of regressions revealed that the hyperbolic decay mo
del and incentive theory provided poor fits to the data, but a modifie
d version of the generalized matching law provided an adequate fit. To
gether, consistent with a general prediction made by discounting model
s, the data supported the conclusion that variable delays can increase
self-control. However, specific discounting models were not able to e
xplain the present data well.