VARIABILITY OF SOIL WETNESS IN A RIDGED SAVANNA SOIL AS INVESTIGATED WITH NEUTRON PROBE

Authors
Citation
Jr. Jensen, VARIABILITY OF SOIL WETNESS IN A RIDGED SAVANNA SOIL AS INVESTIGATED WITH NEUTRON PROBE, Soil technology, 7(2), 1994, pp. 127-135
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Geosciences, Interdisciplinary","Water Resources
Journal title
ISSN journal
09333630
Volume
7
Issue
2
Year of publication
1994
Pages
127 - 135
Database
ISI
SICI code
0933-3630(1994)7:2<127:VOSWIA>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
The variability of soil wetness was studied in the rainy season based on 12 monitoring series in a layout including 18 tubes and 5 depths. T he distribution of point volumetric wetness was found to be non-normal , including a few relatively wet or dry sites. By introducing a simple microrelief index based on the identification of peaks and depression s in the furrows at a horizontal resolution of 50 cm, it was found tha t 40% of the variation in site wetness could be explained by variation s in microrelief, influencing the surface storage and subsequent absor ption of water. Then, defining a representative subarea as an area whi ch includes the full range of variation in microrelief index (at a pro bability of 95%), a minimum plot-length of 12.5 m in the furrow direct ion was estimated for a plot to be representative. The change in profi le (1 m) wetness was found to be normal distributed, with the standard deviation (3.6 mm on average) linearly increasing with the length of the monitoring time interval (T) while the error of estimated areal av erage change in profile wetness, relative to the period evapotranspira tion, increased linearly with the frequency of monitoring (T-1). As a result, the number of access tubes required to estimate change in prof ile wetness at a particular error level was inversely related with the length of the monitoring time interval. Thus, in terms of precision a nd network practicality, a minimum monitoring time interval of about 3 days was found for estimating changes in profile wetnes. Then, 20 tub es were required to ensure a precision of 1.5 mm, equivalent to a maxi mum error of 10% relative to the period evapotranspiration.