T. Staudinger et al., COMPARISON OF THE COMBITUBE(R) WITH AN EN DOTRACHEAL-TUBE DURING PREHOSPITAL CARDIOPULMONARY-RESUSCITATION, Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift, 106(13), 1994, pp. 412-415
A prospective controlled study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy
of the Combitube(TM), a combined endotracheal and esophageal obturato
r airway adjunct, in prehospital cardiac arrest patients. The Combitub
e(TM) and a standard endotracheal tube were utilized on alternate days
as the initial airway of choice by paramedics. Of altogether 86 patie
nts treated during the study period, intubation was possible in 80 cas
es, 38 receiving a Combitube(TM) as initial choice of airway. 11 out o
f 14 patients who could not be intubated with a standard endotracheal
tube were then successfully managed with a Combitube(TM). Survival fol
lowing cardiac arrest after insertion of a Combitube(TM) was comparabl
e to conventional endotracheal intubation. Of the 6 patients who survi
ved 2 had received a Combitube(TM), 2 a standard endotracheal tube and
2 an oropharyngeal tube. While visualized endotracheal intubation rem
ains the preferred method of airway control, the Combitube(TM) is an e
ffective airway as backup to the endotracheal tube, as well as a prima
ry airway, especially outside hospital. Contraindications are listed.