Pressure sores result in patient morbidity and mortality as well as co
mmanding considerable resources within the British National Health Ser
vice. To assess the impact of preventive measures, accurate and reliab
le rates of prevalence and incidence are required. This information is
likely to be used as a measure of quality of care as well being inclu
ded in future purchaser/provider contracting. A number of prevalence s
tudies have been carried out in the United Kingdom using a variety of
populations and different methods. The methods employed in these studi
es need to be considered before any meaningful comparisons can be draw
n. In particular, there are variations in the reported rates possibly
related to the under-reporting of pressure sore prevalence. This paper
describes a recent point prevalence study which suggested that this m
ay be the case. The need for caution when comparing crude rates is hig
hlighted and the importance of standardizing the methods used for dete
rmining prevalence rates is discussed.