M. Kovacs et al., A CONTROLLED PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF DSM-III ADJUSTMENT DISORDER IN CHILDHOOD - SHORT-TERM PROGNOSIS AND LONG-TERM, PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY, Archives of general psychiatry, 51(7), 1994, pp. 535-541
Objectives: Using DSM-III criteria for adjustment disorder (AD), furth
er operationalized by requiring at least three clinically significant
symptoms, we sought to characterize this diagnosis in terms of present
ing features, recovery, and predictive validity among juveniles. Desig
n: The samples included clinically referred, 8- to 13-year-old patient
s with the research diagnosis of AD (N=30) and a high rate of comorbid
disorders and age- and comorbid disorder-matched psychopathologic con
trols (N=26). As part of a naturalistic, longitudinal, nosologic study
, patients were repeatedly examined during an average follow-up interv
al of 7 to 8 years. Results: Adjustment disorder was associated with s
ix symptoms, on average, and 60% of the patients had other, specific p
sychiatric disorders. Adjustment disorder had a median episode length
of 7 months and a 97% recovery rate. Comorbidity had no appreciable ef
fect on recovery. Patients with adjustment disorder and controls had s
imilar rates of new psychiatric disorders and other dysfunctional outc
omes during the follow-up. Conclusions: Among psychiatrically referred
youths, the diagnosis of AD has clinical information value and identi
fies a syndromatic presentation that can be the focus of concern or tr
eatment. It has a reasonably good shortterm prognosis, in spite of the
fact that patients with this diagnosis typically present with comorbi
d specific psychiatric disorders. Controlling for the effects of comor
bidity, AD does not predict later dysfunction. To achieve a convergenc
e of findings from research and clinical practice, it would be importa
nt to ensure a uniform application of specific, operational diagnostic
criteria for AD.