Il. Abraham et al., COGNITIVE SCREENING OF NURSING-HOME RESIDENTS - FACTOR STRUCTURES OF THE MINI-MENTAL-STATE-EXAMINATION, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 42(7), 1994, pp. 750-756
OBJECTIVE: To examine factor structures of the Mini-Mental State Exami
nation, attempting first to replicate any of previously proposed 2-fac
tor solutions; and to explore, secondly, the presence of clinically mo
re differentiated and statistically stable factor structures represent
ing common neurocognitive dimensions. DESIGN: Factor analytic investig
ation of descriptive dataset collected on nursing home residents. Two
factor analyses were performed, one in which the number of factors was
fixed at 2 in an effort to replicate previous studies, and one in whi
ch the number of factors to retain was determined by the scree test. B
oth factor analyses used established methods for judging the adequacy
of the correlation matrix and the significance of factor loadings, and
both applied principal components analysis for initial factor extract
ion and the equamax criterion for orthogonal rotation. SETTING: Seven
nursing homes with a total of 894 beds. PARTICIPANTS: 922 assessments
on nursing home residents were performed, of which 892 were complete a
nd entered into the factor analyses. The observation-to-variable ratio
exceeded 81:1, assuring the statistical stability of factor solutions
derived. MEASUREMENT: The Mini-Mental State Examination, with standar
dization of words to be recalled and the inverted spelling of ''world'
' as the mental reversal task. MAIN RESULTS: Two factor structures wer
e derived. A 2-factor solution, explaining 36.5% of the variance and s
tatistically and conceptually different from those obtained in previou
s studies, distinguished between Perceptual-Organizational and Psychom
otor skills. A 4-factor solution, which explained 56.1% of the varianc
e, included a factor named Executing Psychomotor Commands, while also
further differentiating the perceptual-organizational processes into t
he factors of Memory, Concentration, and Language. CONCLUSION: The 2-f
actor solution shows that, notwithstanding previous claims to the cont
rary, the MMSE can make stable and independent distinctions between ps
ychomotor and perceptual-organizational processes. However, this solut
ion is statistically and conceptually limited and, therefore, of limit
ed clinical and scientific relevance. The 4-factor solution of the MMS
E maps well onto commonly recognized dimensions of neurocognitive abil
ity. It offers a stable, intuitively sound, and statistically supporte
d framework for clinical differentiation of cognitive screening data i
nto independent clinical dimensions of neurocognitive functioning. Thu
s, it offers clinicians and researchers a 4-dimensional framework for
interpreting data obtained by means of the MMSE. Studies with other po
pulations of cognitively impaired and intact elderly are recommended t
o validate and extend the present findings.