This study examines the extent to which the general public anticipates
a future crisis regarding Canada's ability to provide economic suppor
t for its aging population and analyses public opinion regarding polic
y alternatives designed to either increase revenues or reduce expendit
ures for seniors. This paper provides a test of an argument derived fr
om the political economy of aging perspective which suggests that wide
spread acceptance of the population aging crisis scenario predisposes
the public to accept policy options that might otherwise be undesirabl
e. Furthermore, a test is provided of McDaniel's (1987) thesis that po
pulation aging has become a dominant problem 'paradigm' with a potenti
al for influencing public policy discussion. The data are drawn from a
1989 survey of a representative sample of the adult residents of Edmo
nton, Alberta (n = 443). The findings suggest there is a widely shared
perception that Canada in the future will have difficulty supporting
its elderly population. Furthermore, the public appears to be willing
to accept increased taxation, is divided on the issue of targeting ben
efits to lower income seniors, and is opposed to across-the-board cuts
in the levels of benefits paid to seniors. In addition, the data sugg
est that acceptance of the crisis scenario is associated with a willin
gness to accept policy changes such as increased levels of taxation an
d the targeting of old age security benefits. These findings are consi
stent with the political economy of aging perspective and are generall
y supportive of McDaniel's (1987) argument that population aging has b
een widely defined as a problem 'paradigm'. Finally, given that attitu
des did not vary significantly by age, the findings do not support the
argument that population aging necessarily leads to intergenerational
conflict.