COMPARISON OF CLINICAL-DIAGNOSIS AND STANDARD LABORATORY AND MOLECULAR METHODS FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF GENITAL ULCER DISEASE IN LESOTHO - ASSOCIATION WITH HUMAN-IMMUNODEFICIENCY-VIRUS INFECTION
Sa. Morse et al., COMPARISON OF CLINICAL-DIAGNOSIS AND STANDARD LABORATORY AND MOLECULAR METHODS FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF GENITAL ULCER DISEASE IN LESOTHO - ASSOCIATION WITH HUMAN-IMMUNODEFICIENCY-VIRUS INFECTION, The Journal of infectious diseases, 175(3), 1997, pp. 583-589
A multiplex polymerase chain reaction (M-PCR) assay for Haemophilus du
creyi, Treponema pallidum, and herpes simplex virus (HSV) was compared
with clinical and standard laboratory methods for the diagnosis of ge
nital ulcer disease (GUD) in 105 patients; 36% were human immunodefici
ency virus (HIV)-seropositive. Chancroid (80%), syphilis (8%), and gen
ital herpes (8%) were the most frequent diagnoses. H. ducreyi and HSV
were isolated from ulcers of 43% and 18% of patients, respectively; in
35%, all cultures were negative and the laboratory diagnosis indeterm
inate. M-PCR detected H. ducreyi, T. pallidum, and HSV in 56%, 23%, an
d 26% of patients, respectively; (no definitive diagnosis, 6%). The pr
oportion of patients with more than one agent was 4% by culture and 17
% by M-PCR (P = .002). Resolved sensitivities of M-PCR for H. ducreyi
and HSV cultures were 95% and 93%, respectively. The sensitivities of
H. ducreyi and HSV cultures were 75% and 60%, respectively. HSV, detec
ted in 47% of specimens from HIV-infected versus 16% from HIV-uninfect
ed patients (P < .001), may be emerging as a more frequent cause of GU
D.