Ta. Christensen et Jg. Hildebrand, COINCIDENT STIMULATION WITH PHEROMONE COMPONENTS IMPROVES TEMPORAL PATTERN RESOLUTION IN CENTRAL OLFACTORY NEURONS, Journal of neurophysiology, 77(2), 1997, pp. 775-781
Male moths must detect and resolve temporal discontinuities in the sex
pheromonal odor signal emitted by a conspecific female moth to orient
to and locate the odor source. We asked how sensory information about
two key components of the pheromone influences the ability of certain
sexually dimorphic projection (output) neurons in the primary olfacto
ry center of che male moth's brain to encode the frequency and duratio
n of discrete pulses of pheromone blends. Most of the male-specific pr
ojection neurons examined grave mixed postsynaptic responses, consisti
ng of an early suppressive phase followed by activation of firing, to
stimulation of the ipsilateral antenna with a blend of the two behavio
rally essential pheromone components. Of 39 neurons tested, 33 were ex
cited by the principal (most abundant) pheromone component but inhibit
ed by another, less abundant but nevertheless essential component of t
he blend. We tested the ability of each neuron to encode intermittent
pheromonal stimuli by delivering trains of 50-ms pulses of the two-com
ponent blend at progressively higher rates from 1 to 10 per second. Th
ere was a strong con-elation between 1) the amplitude of the early inh
ibitory postsynaptic potential evoked by the second pheromone componen
t and 2) the maximal rate of odor pulses that neuron could resolve (r
= 0.92). Projection neurons receiving stronger inhibitory input encode
d the temporal pattern of the stimulus with higher fidelity. With the
principal, excitatory component of the pheromone alone as the stimulus
, the dynamic range for encoding stimulus intermittency was reduced in
nearly 60% of the neurons tested. The greatest reductions were observ
ed in those neurons that could be shown to receive the strongest inhib
itory input from the second behaviorally essential component of the bl
end. We also tested the ability of these neurons to encode stimulus du
ration. Again there was a strong correlation between the strength of t
he inhibitory input to a neuron mediated by the second pheromone compo
nent and that neuron's ability to encode stimulus duration. Neurons th
at were strongly inhibited by the second component could accurately en
code pulses of the blend from 50 to 500 ms in duration (r = 0.94), but
that ability was reduced in neurons receiving little or no inhibitory
input (r = 0.23). This study confirms that certain olfactory projecti
on neurons respond optimally to a particular odor blend rather than to
the individual components of the blend. The key components activate o
pposing synaptic inputs that enable this subset of central neurons to
copy the duration and frequency of intermittent odor pulses that are a
fundamental feature of airborne olfactory stimuli.