Yj. Sung et Rr. Dietert, NITRIC-OXIDE (CENTER-DOT-NO)-INDUCED MITOCHONDRIAL INJURY AMONG CHICKEN CENTER-DOT-NO-GENERATING AND TARGET LEUKOCYTES, Journal of leukocyte biology, 56(1), 1994, pp. 52-58
In an analysis of nitric oxide (.NO) production and toxicity, chicken
macrophage-generated .NO inhibited mitochondrial activity in both .NO-
producing macrophages themselves and lymphoid tumor targets. However,
differences in targeting of mitochondrial toxicity were observed among
these cells. Two chicken macrophage cell lines, HD11 arid MQ-NCSU, pr
oduced .NO (measured as nitrite) dependent upon concentrations of L-ar
ginine and bacterial endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide). Mitochondrial act
ivity was negatively correlated with the amount of .NO produced. Using
a modified MTT assay, .NO induced suppression in two mitochondrial co
mplexes. Mitochondrial activity was significantly suppressed among HD1
1 cells receiving LPS alone (complex I, 63.0 +/- 5.5% suppression; com
plex II, 27.9 +/- 5.2%). In contrast, mitochondrial activities in samp
les receiving LPS plus inhibitor, N-G-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (N
AME; 5 mM) or 2,4-diamino-6-hydroxypyrimidine (DAHP; 5 mM), were not s
ignificantly different from control values. When HD11 macrophages were
cocultured with lymphoblastoid tumor targets, RECC-CU60 (T cell) or L
SCC-RP9 (B cell), adding LPS (1 mu g/ml), tumor cell mitochondrial act
ivity was significantly suppressed. In the generator macrophages, comp
lex I was more suppressed than complex II, whereas in lymphoid targets
no such difference was observed. These results indicate that .NO inhi
bits complex I and II mitochondrial activity but that differential tar
geting can occur among chicken leukocyte populations.