Women's preferences for hypothetical sperm donors were compared to pre
ferences for long-term mates (Experiment 1) and to those for long-term
mates and extra-pair copulatory (EPC) partners (Experiment 2). In Exp
eriment 1, attributes believed likely to affect a resultant child were
significantly more important in a donor than in a long-term mate. ''C
haracter,'' which was the most important factor in a mate, was the sec
ond most important factor after ''health'' in a donor, despite the bel
ief that character had little likelihood of affecting a resultant chil
d. These results suggest that women were partly relying on the psychol
ogy used to choose a long-term mate when they assessed attributes in a
sperm donor. An additional construct (''resource potential'') was int
roduced in Experiment 2, as well as an additional test condition (EPC)
. As with character, resource potential was believed to have little li
kelihood of affecting a resultant child, yet it was rated as moderatel
y important to have in a donor, further supporting the hypothesis that
women were partly relying on a mate choice psychology. Results did no
t provide support for the existence of an EPC psychology distinct from
that used to select a long-term mate.