Neutron therapy was first introduced by Stone et al. in 1938, i.e. mor
e than 10 years earlier than electron beam therapy and only 6 years af
ter the discovery of neutrons. In spite of the impressive accomplishme
nt in generating an adequate therapy beam, time was also found for car
eful radiobiological studies of neutron beams. However, it was not con
sidered that for a certain early reaction the late effects were much g
reater with neutrons than with x-rays. The severe late sequelae in pro
portion to the few good results motivated the closure of this therapy.
Neutron therapy was again introduced in Hammersmith hospital at the e
nd of the 1960's. The major reason seems to have been to overcome the
oxygen effect. Encouraging results were reported. It was argued that t
he very favourable statistics on local tumour control were obtained at
the expense of more frequent and more severe complications. A clinica
l trial in Edinburgh seemed to indicate this, but it was not proved in
the end as the two trials differed regarding fractionation. Today abo
ut 16 000 patients have been treated with neutrons. The neutron beams
now used differ significantly, both regarding dose distributions and m
icrodosimetrical properties, from those utilized earlier. The advantag
e of neutrons is still, however, controversial. There are indications
that neutron treatment may be favourable for some tumours. A careful c
ost-benefit study ought to be performed before the creation of a neutr
on therapy centre in Sweden as the group of patients suitable for neut
rons is limited, and there may be new possibilities for improvement of
photon and electron treatment with much smaller resources.