G. Garcia et al., EFFECT OF H-1-ANTIHISTAMINES ON HISTAMINE-RELEASE FROM DISPERSED CANINE CUTANEOUS MAST-CELLS, American journal of veterinary research, 58(3), 1997, pp. 293-297
Objective-Because of the implication of histamine in canine atopic der
matitis, H-1-antihistamines may provide a valid alternative to glucoco
rticoid therapy. In vitro study of these drugs prior to clinical testi
ng can allow the most promising compounds to be selected for trials an
d render trials with drugs of doubtful efficacy unnecessary. Sample Po
pulation-Isolated canine cutaneous mast cells. Procedure-Cells were pr
eincubated with antihistamines at increasing concentrations and incuba
ted with concanavalin A (1,000 mu g/ml), calcium ionophore A23187 (1 m
u M), and substance P (100 mu m). Compound 48/80 was not used because
it proved to be cytotoxic. Results-Generally, significant prodegranula
ting effect was not observed for most of the studied agents. Only terf
enadine increased spontaneous histamine release at concentrations > 30
mu M. Cetirizine did not block histamine release at any of the studie
d concentrations. Ketotifen had a low inhibitory effect only at the hi
ghest concentration (100 mu M) after concanavalin A- (23.6 +/- 2.8%) a
nd calcium ionophore A23187 (29.8 +/- 3.0%) induced release. Terfenadi
ne caused a concentration-dependent inhibitory effect after ionophore
A23187- (48.1 +/- 2.2%) and concanavalin A- (28.9 +/- 2.3%) activation
, but was inactive against substance P-induced release. In contrast, l
oratadine had potent dose-dependent inhibition of concanavalin A- and
ionophore A23187-induced histamine release, with maximal effect of 85.
6 +/- 3.1% and 62.6 +/- 4.7%, respectively, at 100 mu M concentration.
After substance P activation, histamine release was only slightly inh
ibited by loratadine (14.8 +/- 1.1%). Conclusions-This study documents
the behavior of isolated canine cutaneous mast cells in the presence
of nonimmunologic stimulation. Using this in vitro method, we were abl
e to determine that loratadine is the only antihistamine that has pote
nt inhibition of histamine release from dog cutaneous mast cells witho
ut a substantial prodegranulating effect. Loratadine is, therefore, a
good candidate for clinical testing.