J. Lonnqvist et al., ANTIDEPRESSANT EFFICACY AND QUALITY-OF-LIFE IN DEPRESSION - A DOUBLE-BLIND-STUDY WITH MOCLOBEMIDE AND FLUOXETINE, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica, 89(6), 1994, pp. 363-369
The efficacy of moclobemide (300-450 mg/day) was compared with fluoxet
ine (20-40 mg/day) in a double-blind, multicentre study in 209 patient
s with new episodes of depression selected from 612 consecutive depres
sed patients representative of those consulting psychiatric services i
n Finland. Antidepressant efficacy was assessed with the Hamilton Depr
ession Rating Scale (HDRS), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale
and Clinical Global Impression (CGI). The Medical Outcome Study Short-
form General Health Survey (SF-20) and 15D Measure of Quality of Life
were used to measure effectiveness in terms of health-related quality
of life. Efficacy was evident with both drug treatments, with 67% in t
he moclobemide group and 57% in the fluoxetine group having a reductio
n in HDRS of more than 50%. Similarly, 77% of the patients in the mocl
obemide group and 67% in the fluoxetine group were assessed on the CGI
as much better or very much better after 6 weeks of treatment. The mo
st commonly reported adverse events were nausea, other gastrointestina
l symptoms, nervousness, dizziness and sleep disorders. Nausea was sig
nificantly more common in the fluoxetine group and was found especiall
y in women. Premature terminations of treatment were 18% in the moclob
emide and 21% in the fluoxetine group. A significant change for the be
tter in quality of life was found in both treatment groups, even at we
ek 2 but especially after 6 weeks of treatment. Improvement was not on
ly seen in dimensions measuring depression or mental health but also i
n other dimensions.