PELVIC FRACTURE MECHANISM OF INJURY IN VEHICULAR TRAUMA PATIENTS

Citation
Ec. Gokcen et al., PELVIC FRACTURE MECHANISM OF INJURY IN VEHICULAR TRAUMA PATIENTS, The journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care, 36(6), 1994, pp. 789-795
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Emergency Medicine & Critical Care
Volume
36
Issue
6
Year of publication
1994
Pages
789 - 795
Database
ISI
SICI code
Abstract
To investigate the correlation between motor vehicle crash mechanisms and pelvic injury in front-seat occupants, we retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of, and had complete crash reconstructions perfo rmed for, 145 vehicular trauma patients with Injury Severity Scores gr eater than 16 admitted to a level I trauma center. After excluding rea r-seat and ejected occupants, 44 of the remaining 115 patients had pel vic injuries. We excluded acetabular fractures and classified the rema ining 26 pelvic ring fractures by the system of Young and Burgess: 20 lateral compression (LC) fractures, five anteroposterior compression ( APC) fractures, and one combined mechanical injury (CMI) fracture. Eig hteen pelvic fractures were managed conservatively; eight required sur gical intervention and four of those eight required emergent applicati on of an external fixator for unresponsive hypotension. Trained invest igation teams conducted the crash reconstructions, evaluating crash si tes and vehicles with direct measurements of more than 500 variables. Calculations from these data, e.g., direction of impact and change in velocity at impact (DELTAV), were made with the CRASH III computer pro gram and statistical analyses were performed using Chi-square and t te sts. This information was then merged with the orthopedic evaluations. We found that: (1) 72% of the pelvic fractures occurred in automobile s with gross vehicular weights less than 2700 lb (compact and subcompa ct) (p = 0.05); (2) the DELTAV was lower for lateral impacts than for frontal impacts (24 mph vs. 32 mph, respectively; p = 0.0005); (3) mor e victims of lateral than frontal impacts suffered pelvic fractures (5 0% vs. 7.5%, respectively, p = 0.0001); (4) more victims of lateral th an frontal impacts suffered LC injuries (83% vs. 17%, respectively; p < 0.0001); and (5) LC-II and LC-III fractures tended to occur at highe r DELTAVs than did LC-1 fractures (29.0 mph vs. 23.5 mph, respectively ). We concluded that there was a direct correlation between pelvic inj ury and vehicular mechanism of injury, substantiating the pelvic injur y classification system of Young and Burgess, and that there is a need for additional side impact protection in motor vehicles.