E. Weninger et al., COMPARISON BETWEEN INTERPLEURAL ANALGESIA AND PERIDURAL ANESTHESIA INPATIENTS UNDERGOING UROLOGICAL SURGERY IN THE LATERAL POSITION, Anasthesiologie und Intensivmedizin, 35(6), 1994, pp. 185-190
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Anesthesiology,"Emergency Medicine & Critical Care
A total of 27 patients undergoing open urological surgery in the later
al decubitus were prospectively randomized to two groups: Group I rece
ived a pleural catheter group II lumbar peridural analgesia, in each c
ase combined with endotracheal anaesthesia. Both groups were given 0.5
% bupivacaine; group I received 2 mg/kg body weight to a maximum of 15
0 mg while group II were given 1-1.8 ml for each segment blocked. A co
mparison was made between the haemodynamics, the extent of post-operat
ive pain, the plasma levels of bupivacaine, and the side effects obser
ved with the two methods. While the haemodynamic parameters in group I
remained stable, three patients in group II developed hypotension, on
e of whom additionally experienced bradycardia. Both groups experience
d good, but not complete, analgesia in the early postoperative phase.
During the course of this study no case of pneumothorax was observed,
a fact we attribute to the advantages of the puncture set we employed
No signs of toxic reaction were to be observed.