Two-hundred and forty-three NavY recruits participated in a study that
examined die relationship between strategy use and intelligence. Each
subject contributed ten enlistment aptitude and achievement scores, t
ook eight additional paper-and-pencil aptitude and intelligence tests,
and three computer-administered tests. The computer tests were design
ed such that as item difficulty increased it became advantageous to st
rategically shift focus from one aspect of the items to another. Based
on reaction time (RT) patterns it was possible to: (a) determine the
point along the item difficulty continua where focus shifted, and (b)
compare subjects' shift points with the logically optimal shift point.
RTs from the computer tests were significantly intercorrelated and we
re related to psychometric test scores, particularly fluid intelligenc
e. The strategy measures derived from the computer tests were statisti
cally independent from one another and revealed no relationship with a
ny of the psychometric tests. These results cast doubt on previous emp
irical research and theoretical arguments that strongly link strategy
use and general intelligence.