SAFETY OF ESMOLOL IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION TREATED WITH THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY WHO HAD RELATIVE CONTRAINDICATIONS TO BETA-BLOCKER THERAPY
An. Mooss et al., SAFETY OF ESMOLOL IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION TREATED WITH THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY WHO HAD RELATIVE CONTRAINDICATIONS TO BETA-BLOCKER THERAPY, The Annals of pharmacotherapy, 28(6), 1994, pp. 701-703
OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to evaluate the safety of esmolol
in 114 patients treated with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial
infarction who also had relative contraindications to beta-blockade,
and the predictive value of patient tolerance to esmolol and subsequen
t patient tolerance of oral beta-blocker therapy. PATIENTS: One hundre
d and fourteen patients with myocardial infarction documented by enzym
e concentrations and electrocardiographic changes who also had relativ
e contraindications to beta-blockade. METHODS: Esmolol was initiated d
uring acute myocardial infarction for myocardial ischemia (n=88), hype
rtension (n=13), or supraventricular tachycardia (n=13). Relative cont
raindications to beta-blocker therapy included either active signs/sym
ptoms of left ventricular dysfunction or a history of congestive heart
failure (n=40), a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or
asthma (n=31), bradycardia (HR <60 beats/min; n=18), peripheral vascu
lar disease (n=15), or hypotension (systolic BP <100 mm Hg; n=14). RES
ULTS: During initial esmolol dose titration, 69 patients tolerated 300
mug/kg/min, 12 patients tolerated 200 mug/kg/min, 17 patients tolerat
ed 100 mug/kg/min, and 16 patients tolerated 50 mug/kg/min. Twenty-eig
ht patients (25 percent) developed dose-limiting adverse effects durin
g esmolol maintenance infusions. Sixteen patients required esmolol dos
e reduction and 12 required esmolol discontinuation. Adverse effects r
eversed within 30-45 minutes following dose reduction or discontinuati
on. The 86 patients who tolerated esmolol infusions without dose reduc
tion or drug discontinuation were subsequently treated with oral beta-
blockers. Eleven of these patients (13 percent) developed adverse effe
cts requiring oral beta-blocker discontinuation. Nine of these patient
s had tolerated only 50 mug/kg/min of esmolol, and the other 2 patient
s had tolerated only 100 mug/kg/min. CONCLUSIONS: Esmolol can be used
safely in most patients treated with thrombolytic therapy for acute my
ocardial infarction who have relative contraindications to beta-blocke
rs. Tolerance to higher maintenance doses of esmolol is a good predict
or of subsequent outcome with oral beta-blocker therapy.