SPATIAL LIMITATION OF EYE-MOVEMENTS DURING OCULAR EXPLORATION OF SIMPLE LINE-DRAWINGS IN NEGLECT SYNDROME

Authors
Citation
Ho. Karnath, SPATIAL LIMITATION OF EYE-MOVEMENTS DURING OCULAR EXPLORATION OF SIMPLE LINE-DRAWINGS IN NEGLECT SYNDROME, Cortex, 30(2), 1994, pp. 319-330
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences,"Behavioral Sciences
Journal title
CortexACNP
ISSN journal
00109452
Volume
30
Issue
2
Year of publication
1994
Pages
319 - 330
Database
ISI
SICI code
0010-9452(1994)30:2<319:SLOEDO>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
The eye movement behaviour of a patient suffering from a right basal g anglia infarction with left-sided neglect but without any visual field defects was investigated during the ocular exploration of simple line drawings. The eye movements were registered by means of an i.r. light technique. Each line drawing consisted of different figural elements located in the centre and both the left and the right half of the pict ure. In each case, only the contextual connection of the left and righ t elements in a drawing allowed the spectator to describe the whole sc ene consistently and to perceive the correct theme of the drawing. The drawings fell into two categories. The cognitive impact of the elemen ts in the drawings' centre was varied by ''pointing'' to the elements located in the left and right halves with a different strength of conn ection. When exploring the two types of drawings (weak vs. strong conn ective elements in the centre) the patient showed a similar eye moveme nt pattern, exploring exclusively the right halves of the drawings. Ir respective of the cognitive impact of the drawing's central elements i n ''pointing'' towards supplementary information in the picture's left half, exploration of this half took place in neither case. A striking difference between the two categories was, however, found concerning the patient's ability to recognize the general context, i.e. to descri be the correct theme of the whole drawing. While the patient could not correctly depict any of the scenes from the drawings with weak connec tive elements in the centre, he was easily capable of properly describ ing the themes from the group of drawings with strong connective eleme nts, which implies that he must have analysed and perceived the figura l elements of both halves of the picture. Different possibilities are discussed to explain the similarity of the patient's exploratory eye m ovements but discrepancy in his verbal responses when dealing with the two different types of drawings.