VALIDATION OF NCCLS MACROLIDE (AZITHROMYCIN, CLARITHROMYCIN, AND ERYTHROMYCIN) INTERPRETIVE CRITERIA FOR HAEMOPHILUS-INFLUENZAE TESTED WITHTHE HAEMOPHILUS TEST MEDIUM
Rn. Jones et al., VALIDATION OF NCCLS MACROLIDE (AZITHROMYCIN, CLARITHROMYCIN, AND ERYTHROMYCIN) INTERPRETIVE CRITERIA FOR HAEMOPHILUS-INFLUENZAE TESTED WITHTHE HAEMOPHILUS TEST MEDIUM, Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease, 18(4), 1994, pp. 243-249
Some recently marketed macrolide antimicrobial agents possess physioch
emical, antimicrobial, and pharmacokinetic advantages that enable thei
r wider clinical use against Haemophilus influenzae infections. A five
-laboratory study assessed the validity of existing or proposed azithr
omycin, clarithromycin, and erythromycin interpretive criteria for tes
ts with H. influenzae isolates. National Committee for Clinical Labora
tory Standards (NCCLS) methods, criteria, and quality-control guidelin
es were used. A total of 350 H. influenzae strains were processed, inc
luding fresh clinical isolates (250 strains) and replicate tests of 10
0 stock cultures sampling strains isolated from 1984 to 91. Azithromyc
in interpretive criteria (susceptible at less than or equal to 4 mu g/
ml, greater than or equal to 12 mm) produced a 99.8% absolute agreemen
t between the minimum inhibitory concentrations and disk diffusion res
ults (0.2% false-susceptible error) Clarithromycin breakpoint criteria
(susceptible at less than or equal to 8 mu g/ml, greater than or equa
l to 13 mm; and resistant at greater than or equal to 32 mu g/ml, less
than or equal to 10 mm) produced high minor interpretive error, but l
ess than or equal to 1% combined false-susceptible and false-resistant
discrepancies. Erythrmycin interpretive guidelines were initially pro
posed for susceptible at less than or equal to 0.5 mu g/ml, greater th
an or equal to 26 mm. This categorizes nearly all H. influenzae strain
s as resistant to this older macrolide. The NCCLS should consider the
proposed erythromycin criteria for publication in appropriate tables,
and a class drug should also be selected (azithromycin) that would bes
t predict macrolide-class susceptibility for those agents indicated by
the US Food and Drug Administration for H. influenzae infection chemo
therapy (azithromycin and clarithromycin). No serious interpretive pro
blems were observed with the current NCCLS criteria using Haemophilus
test medium.