COMPARISON OF BUPRENORPHINE AND METHADONE IN THE TREATMENT OF OPIOID DEPENDENCE

Citation
Ec. Strain et al., COMPARISON OF BUPRENORPHINE AND METHADONE IN THE TREATMENT OF OPIOID DEPENDENCE, The American journal of psychiatry, 151(7), 1994, pp. 1025-1030
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Psychiatry,Psychiatry
ISSN journal
0002953X
Volume
151
Issue
7
Year of publication
1994
Pages
1025 - 1030
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-953X(1994)151:7<1025:COBAMI>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Objective: This study compared the efficacy of buprenorphine and metha done in the treatment of opioid dependence, Method: Participants (N=16 4) were relatively treatment-naive, opioid-dependent applicants to a 2 6-week treatment program who were randomly assigned to either methadon e or buprenorphine treatment. Dosing was double-blind and double-dummy . Patients were stabilized on a regimen of either methadone, 50 mg, or buprenorphine, 8 mg, with dose changes possible through week 16 of tr eatment. urine samples were collected three times a week, and weekly c ounseling was provided. Results: Buprenorphine (mean dose=8.9 mg/day) and methadone (mean dose=54 mg/day) were equally effective in sustaini ng retention in treatment, compliance with medication, and counseling regimens. In both groups, 56% of patients remained in treatment throug h the 16-week flexible dosing period. Overall opioid-positive urine sa mple rates were 55% and 47% for buprenorphine and methadone groups, re spectively; cocaine-positive urine sample rates were 70% and 58%. Evid ence was obtained for the effectiveness of dose increases in suppressi ng opioid, but not cocaine, use among those who received dose increase s. Conclusions: The results of this study provide further support for the utility of buprenorphine as a new medication in the treatment of o pioid dependence and demonstrate efficacy equivalent to that of methad one when used during a clinically guided flexible dosing procedure.