Mj. Bell et al., IMPORTANCE OF VARIATION IN CHILLING TOLERANCE FOR PEANUT GENOTYPIC ADAPTATION TO COOL, SHORT-SEASON ENVIRONMENTS, Crop science, 34(4), 1994, pp. 1030-1039
Recent studies have shown genotypic variation in sensitivity of leafle
t CO2 exchange rate (CER) to cool night temperatures. However, no info
rmation is currently available on the relative importance of this trai
t for successful peanut production in a cool, short-season environment
. The objectives of this study were to examine the physiological basis
of genotype adaptation to a cool, short-season environment and to ass
ess the importance of genotypic differences in sensitivity to low nigh
t temperatures in that adaptation. Eight genotypes were grown in the f
ield at Delhi, Ontario in 1991, and six of these eight were grown in 1
992. Phenological development was monitored, dry matter (DM) accumulat
ion was determined from destructive samples, and radiation use efficie
ncy (RUE) was calculated from measurements of fractional interception
of incident photosynthetically active radiation (PAR). Accumulated deg
ree-days in 1991 (1245 degrees C d from sowing to frost) greatly excee
ded those in 1992 (885 degrees C d), despite similar calendar-day dura
tion. Only five genotypes matured in 1991 and two in 1992. The degree-
days required to reach key reproductive stages including maturity vari
ed considerably among genotypes and between seasons. Seasonal variatio
n was probably due to effects of low temperatures on continuity of rep
roductive development and the proportion of total kernels that were ma
ture at harvest. Total DM was reduced by 30 to 50% in 1992, compared w
ith 1991, whereas pod and kernel yields were reduced by 40 to 75 and 3
8 to 83%, respectively. The lower DM in 1992, and genotypic difference
s in both seasons, were due primarily to the amount of incident PAR in
tercepted by canopies (i.e., 520-790 MJ m(-2) in 1991 and 360-480 MJ m
(-2) in 1992). The RUE was 13 to 24% lower during 1992, compared with
1998, with relative genotype RUE generally consistent with CER sensiti
vity to low night temperature. Early maturity combined with an ability
to rapidly expand a canopy to intercept incident PAR were the factors
most important for peanut production in this environment.