Ma. Damario et al., THE ROLE OF UTEROSACRAL LIGAMENT RESECTION IN CONSERVATIVE OPERATIONSFOR RECURRENT ENDOMETRIOSIS, Journal of gynecologic surgery, 10(2), 1994, pp. 57-61
Fifteen patients with a history of endometriosis and recurrent pelvic
pain underwent conservative resection at laparotomy. Microsurgical res
ection of endometriotic lesions and restoration of pelvic anatomy were
performed. Presacral neurectomy was carried out in 12 of 15 (80%) pat
ients complaining of significant midline pelvic dysmenorrhea. All pati
ents had retroperitoneal dissections and bilateral uterosacral ligamen
t resections regardless of whether or not there was clinical suspicion
of uterosacral ligament involvement. Dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and d
yschezia were relieved in 12 of 15 (80%), 7 of 12 (58%), and 8 of 11 (
77%) patients, respectively. Eight patients (54%) had histological inv
olvement of the uterosacral ligaments. Of this subgroup of patients, a
ll had relief of dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and dyschezia postoperativ
ely. Gross appearance was not always reliable in determining uterosacr
al ligament involvement. We believe that bilateral uterosacral ligamen
t resection may benefit patients with endometriosis by improving sympt
oms of deeply infiltrating lesions (dyspareunia, dyschezia) in additio
n to the known effects of conservative resection and presacral neurect
omy in alleviating dysmenorrhea. Further study of this adjunctive proc
edure in a prospective fashion appears warranted.