This paper reports on a theory building effort to understand the persi
stent difficulties with successful product innovation in large, establ
ished firms. Drawing on an institutional approach, we suggest that the
constituent activities of effective product innovation either violate
established practice or fall into a vacuum where no shared understand
ings exist to make them meaningful. Product innovation, therefore, is
illegitimate. This means that to enhance their innovative abilities, m
anagers must weave the activities of product innovation into their ins
titutionalized system of thought and action, not merely change structu
res or add values. We use insights from 134 innovators to identify the
different ways that product innovation is illegitimate, and to consid
er alternate ways to overcome these problems. Exploratory results sugg
est that successful product innovators experience as many instances of
illegitimacy as others, but creatively reframed their activities more
often to legitimate their work. We conclude with some new insights fo
r why barriers to innovation exist in large, established firms, and ho
w those barriers can be managed.