PERITONEAL WASHING CYTOLOGY COMBINED WITH IMMUNOCYTOCHEMICAL STAININGAND DETECTING MUTANT K-RAS IN PANCREATIC-CANCER - COMPARISON OF THE SENSITIVITY AND AVAILABILITY OF VARIOUS METHODS
S. Nomoto et al., PERITONEAL WASHING CYTOLOGY COMBINED WITH IMMUNOCYTOCHEMICAL STAININGAND DETECTING MUTANT K-RAS IN PANCREATIC-CANCER - COMPARISON OF THE SENSITIVITY AND AVAILABILITY OF VARIOUS METHODS, Pancreas, 14(2), 1997, pp. 126-132
Peritoneal metastases are the second most common site of involvement,
following the liver, in pancreatic cancer. Thus, we performed peritone
al washing cytology at laparotomy to diagnose accurately the intraperi
toneal spread of carcinoma cells to determine the appropriate therapy.
Peritoneal washings were collected at laparotomy from 20 Japanese pan
creatic carcinoma patients at Nagoya University Hospital between April
1993 and December 1994. From centrifuged deposits, we examined the cy
tology by three methods as follows. The first method was conventional
cytology, including May-Grunwald and Giemsa, Papanicolaou, periodic ac
id-Schiff, and Alcian blue. The second method was immunocytochemical s
taining, using antibodies to carbohydrate antigen (CA19-9) and carcino
embryonic antigen. After extracting DNA from the remaining pellet, we
studied the last method, detecting K-ras point mutation, by two-step p
olymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism
analysis. In two cases, peritoneal metastases were macroscopically rec
ognized, and the results of all three methods were positive. In the tw
o other cases, where peritoneal dissemination was not macroscopically
recognized, the judgments of conventional cytological study and detect
ing K-ras point mutation were negative. However, a few malignant cells
were found by the immunocytochemical staining method. Judging from th
eir clinical course, the positively stained cells were suggestive of m
alignancy. At present, the immunocytochemical staining method is the m
ost sensitive of these three methods in peritoneal washing cytology. H
owever, preserving DNA is suitable for repeated examination, and a mod
ified method can be applied. If the sensitivity increases, the method
of detecting K-ras has the potential to become the standard for perito
neal washing cytology in pancreatic cancer.