Ja. Lee et al., TYR-129 IS IMPORTANT TO THE PEPTIDE LIGAND AFFINITY AND SELECTIVITY OF HUMAN ENDOTHELIN TYPE-A RECEPTOR, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United Statesof America, 91(15), 1994, pp. 7164-7168
Molecular modeling and protein engineering techniques have been used t
o study residues within G-protein-coupled receptors that are potential
ly important to ligand binding and selectivity. In this study, Tyr-129
located in transmembrane domain 2 of the human endothelin (ET) type A
receptor A (hET(A)) was targeted on the basis of differences between
the hET(A) and type B receptor (hET(B)) sequences and the position of
the residue on ET receptor models built using the coordinates of bacte
riorhodopsin. Replacement of Tyr-129 of hET(A) by alanine, glutamine,
asparagine, histidine, lysine, serine, or phenylalanine results in rec
eptor variants with enhanced ET-3 and sarafotoxin 6C affinities but wi
th unchanged ET-1 and ET-2 affinities. Except for Tyr-129 --> Phe hET(
A), these hET(A) variants have two to three orders of magnitude lower
binding affinity for the ET(A)-selective antagonist BQ123. Replacement
of His-150, the residue in hET(B) that is analogous in sequence to Ty
r-129 of hET(A), by either tyrosine or alanine does not affect the aff
inity of peptide ligands. These results indicate that although transme
mbrane domain 2 is important in ligand selectivity for hET(A), it does
not play a significant role in the lack of ligand selectivity shown b
y hET(B). Chimeric receptors have been constructed that further suppor
t these conclusions and indicate that at least two hET(A) regions cont
ribute to ligand selectivity. Additionally, the data support an overla
p in the binding site in hET(A) of agonists ET-3 and sarafotoxin 6C wi
th that of the antagonist BQ123.