Repeated games, such as the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma (IPD), are oft
en used as idealised models of social interactions. Here, I develop a
state space approach to the study of two-player, repeated games. A str
ategy is represented by way of a state space, where a player's choice
of action depends on the current state, and where the actions performe
d can cause transitions from one state to another. This kind of repres
entation provides a possible link between a game theoretical analysis
and concepts from mechanistically oriented ethology, where an individu
al's state is viewed as made up of motivational variables. Using the c
oncept of a limit ESS for a game in the extensive form, I derive a num
ber of fundamental results for state space strategies. Conditions ensu
ring purity of a limit ESS are given, as well as a characterisation of
the most important class of pure limit ESSs. The theoretical analysis
covers games with and without a role asymmetry and also games where p
layers move alternately. To illustrate the state space approach, I app
ly the theoretical results to three examples. First, for the role symm
etric IPD, I find a great number of pure limit ESSs, and relate these
to the strategies most frequently studied previously. I also discuss w
hether there can be randomised limit ESSs, concluding that although th
is is possible, none have been found so far. Second, as a game possess
ing a role asymmetry, I study a simplified model of social dominance.
I concentrate on the question of whether punishment administered by a
dominant can determine the allocation of a resource between the domina
nt and a subdominant. The game turns out to have limit ESSs with this
property, but there are also stable strategies where the dominant lack
s control. Third, I analyse an alternating Prisoner's Dilemma, which i
s a natural model to investigate the evolution of reciprocal altruism.
No stable strategy for this game has been described previously. Of th
e limit ESSs I find, one is of particular interest, in that it closely
corresponds to the notion of reciprocal altruism as conceived by Triv
ers. (C) 1997 Academic Press Limited.