RESPIRATORY CONTROL IN THE TRANSITION FROM WATER TO AIR-BREATHING IN VERTEBRATES

Authors
Citation
Nj. Smatresk, RESPIRATORY CONTROL IN THE TRANSITION FROM WATER TO AIR-BREATHING IN VERTEBRATES, American zoologist, 34(2), 1994, pp. 264-279
Citations number
73
Categorie Soggetti
Zoology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00031569
Volume
34
Issue
2
Year of publication
1994
Pages
264 - 279
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-1569(1994)34:2<264:RCITTF>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
Studies on extant bimodally breathing vertebrates offer us a chance to gain insight into the changes in respiratory control during the evolu tionary transition from water to air breathing. In primitive Actinopte rygian air-breathing fishes (Lepisosteus and Amia), gill ventilation i s driven by an endogenously active central rhythm generator that is po werfully modulated by afferent input from internally and externally or iented branchial chemoreceptors, as it is in water-breathing Actinopte rygians. The effects of internal or external chemoreceptor stimulation on water and air breathing vary substantially in these aquatic air br eathers, suggesting that their roles are evolutionarily malleable. Air breathing in these bimodal breathers usually occurs as single breaths taken at irregular intervals and is an on-demand phenomenon activated primarily by afferent input from the branchial chemoreceptors. There is no evidence for central CO2/pH sensitive chemoreceptors and air-bre athing organ mechanoreceptors have little influence over branchial- or air-breathing patterns in Actinopterygian air breathers. In the Sarco pterygian lungfish Lepidosiren and Protopterus, ventilation of the hig hly reduced gills is relatively unresponsive to chemoreceptor or mecha noreceptor input. The branchial chemoreceptors of the anterior arches appear to monitor arterialized blood, while chemoreceptors in the post erior arches may monitor venous blood. Lungfish respond vigorously to hypercapnia, but it is not known whether these responses are mediated by central or peripheral chemoreceptors. A major difference between th e Sarcopterygian and Actinopterygian bimodal breathers is that lungfis h can inflate their lungs using rhythmic bouts of air breathing, and l ung mechanoreceptors influence the onset and termination of these lung inflation cycles. The control of breathing in amphibians appears simi lar to that of lungfish. Branchial ventilation may persist as rhythmic buccal oscillations in most adults, and stimulation of peripheral che moreceptors in the aortic arch or carotid labyrinths initiates short b outs of breathing. Ventilation is much more responsive to hypercapnia in adult amphibians than in Actinopterygian fishes because of central CO2/pH sensitive chemoreceptors that act to convert periodic to more c ontinuous breathing patterns when stimulated.