Sk. Fisher et al., SOURCES OF ERROR ASSOCIATED WITH SAMPLE COLLECTION AND PREPARATION OFNUCLEATED BLOOD-CELLS FOR FLOW CYTOMETRIC ANALYSIS, Cell biology and toxicology, 10(3), 1994, pp. 145-153
Analysis of cellular DNA content by flow cytometry has been used to de
tect genetic changes associated with exposure to environmental contami
nants. In lower vertebrates, nucleated red blood cells can be collecte
d for analysis without harm to the animal. Because erythrocytes sample
d from an individual should have identical amounts of DNA, the coeffic
ient of variation (CV) around the G0/G1 peak should be small. Increase
s in CV can indicate genetic aberrations, but may also be caused by sa
mple handling and preparation or problems with instrumentation. To inc
rease confidence in associating increases in CV with external causes,
artifactual changes in CV due to sample treatment and instrument param
eters should be identified and minimized. We assessed the effects of v
arious sampling and handling protocols on the CV of nucleated blood ce
lls collected from largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides). We also co
mpared the distribution of cells among the G0/G1, S, and G2/M phases o
f the cell cycle to see whether these were affected by sampling or tre
atment protocols. Groups of 7 fish were bled on 7 consecutive days, an
d blood from each fish was analyzed by flow cytometry when freshly col
lected, and after freezing for 1 hour or 10 days. The same fish were b
led again over a consecutive 7-day period, and the experiment was repe
ated. CV and cell cycle distribution were not affected by our freezing
protocol. Repeat sampling from the same individual did not affect CV,
but altered the distribution of cells in the cell cycle, suggesting i
ncreased hemopoiesis in response to blood sampling. Day-to-day variati
on in the CV occurred in both fresh and frozen samples, probably as th
e result of small variations in instrument adjustments. These results
demonstrate the suitability of this freezing protocol for these blood
samples, and illustrate the importance of assessing sources of variati
on when using flow cytometry to screen wild populations in genotoxicol
ogical studies.